ID Country Sizing Province Nearest City Footage Insulation Temperature Scale Heating Demand Load Temperature Published
2868 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Edmonton 2000 High Celsius 30000 -20
2869 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Edmonton 2000 High Celsius 28000 -20
2870 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Edmonton 2000 High Celsius 25000 -20
2871 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Edmonton 2000 High Celsius 26500 -20
2872 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Edmonton 2000 High Celsius 26000 -20
2873 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Edmonton 2000 High Celsius 25500 -20
2874 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Alberta Edmonton 2700 High Celsius 25500 -20
2875 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Massachusetts Plymouth 2500 High N/A 0 0
2876 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Maryland Frederick 3200 Medium N/A 0 0
2877 United States Size by Square Footage and Location New Mexico Santa Fe 2100 High N/A 0 0
2878 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Washington Yakima 02500 High N/A 0 0
2879 United States Size by Square Footage and Location New Mexico Santa Fe 3461 Medium N/A 0 0
2880 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Ontario Owen Sound 2000 High N/A 0 0
2881 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Quebec Mont Joli 1705 High N/A 0 0
2882 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Massachusetts Worcester 1000 High N/A 0 0
2883 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Alberta Calgary 4500 High N/A 0 0
2884 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Colorado Chaffee 2500 Medium N/A 0 0
2885 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Nova Scotia Bridgewater 3100 Medium N/A 0 0
2886 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Saskatchewan Prince Albert 1520 Medium N/A 0 0
2887 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Nova Scotia Dartmouth 2700 Medium N/A 0 0

*NOTE* This heat pump sizing tool does not consider cooling loads. There is a possibility that your cooling load is higher than your heating load, and as such the heat pump model suggested by this tool might not be appropriate for your project. This issue is most likely to effect customers based around the great lakes and in the southeast quarter of the U.S.A where summer humidity is high. If your project is located in these areas, a calculated cooling load needs to be considered. A manual J report can calculate the cooling load of your project accurately.

Arctic takes no responsibility for any cooling performance issues resulting from using this estimation to size a heat pump instead of a manual J.

If you would like Arctic to conduct a manual J for your project, please click the link below:

Arctic Heat pumps Logo

LET US HELP

OUR PRODUCTS

RESOURCES

RESOURCES