ID Country Sizing Province Nearest City Footage Insulation Temperature Scale Heating Demand Load Temperature Published
2074 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Alaska Ketchikan Gateway 2400 High N/A 0 0
2075 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Alaska Ketchikan Gateway 2400 High N/A 0 0
2076 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location British Columbia Dawson Creek 3500 Medium N/A 0 0
2077 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location British Columbia Dawson Creek 2700 Medium N/A 0 0
2078 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location British Columbia Dawson Creek 2700 High N/A 0 0
2079 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Michigan Grand Traverse 2300 Medium N/A 0 0
2080 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Michigan Grand Traverse 02300 Medium N/A 0 0
2081 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Oregon Washington 3600 Medium N/A 0 0
2082 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Alaska Kenai Peninsula 3000 Medium N/A 0 0
2083 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Minnesota Ramsey 1500 Low N/A 0 0
2084 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Minnesota Ramsey 1500 Medium N/A 0 0
2085 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Minnesota Ramsey 1500 High N/A 0 0
2086 United States Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Ramsey 1500 High Fahrenheit 44000 -20
2087 United States Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 Ramsey 1500 High Fahrenheit 44000 -11
2088 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Alaska Kenai Peninsula 3000 Low N/A 0 0
2089 United States Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 0 0 Fahrenheit 60000 9
2090 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 0 0 Celsius 40000 -17
2091 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Vermont Rutland 3000 Medium N/A 0 0
2092 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Vermont Rutland 3000 Low N/A 0 0
2093 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Vermont Rutland 4000 Medium N/A 0 0

*NOTE* This heat pump sizing tool does not consider cooling loads. There is a possibility that your cooling load is higher than your heating load, and as such the heat pump model suggested by this tool might not be appropriate for your project. This issue is most likely to effect customers based around the great lakes and in the southeast quarter of the U.S.A where summer humidity is high. If your project is located in these areas, a calculated cooling load needs to be considered. A manual J report can calculate the cooling load of your project accurately.

Arctic takes no responsibility for any cooling performance issues resulting from using this estimation to size a heat pump instead of a manual J.

If you would like Arctic to conduct a manual J for your project, please click the link below:

Arctic Heat pumps Logo

LET US HELP

OUR PRODUCTS

RESOURCES

RESOURCES