Build & Pricing Tools
LOCATE A DEALER
Hydronic Design Services
CONNECT WTIH AN EXPERT
1-866-800-8123
ID Country Sizing Province Nearest City Footage Insulation Temperature Scale Heating Demand Load Temperature Published
1970 United States Size by Square Footage and Location North Dakota Grand Forks 1000 Medium N/A 0 0
1971 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Quebec Magog 1500 Low N/A 0 0
1972 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Quebec Sherbrooke 2700 High N/A 0 0
1973 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Quebec Magog 2700 High N/A 0 0
1974 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature Quebec 0 2700 High Celsius 14.1 -29
1975 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 0 0 Celsius 35828 -30
1976 United States Size by Square Footage and Location New York Columbia 1500 Medium N/A 0 0
1977 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Alberta Edmonton 1600 High Celsius 14.1 -29
1978 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Vermont Orleans 2200 Medium N/A 0 0
1979 Canada Size by heating demand load and design temperature 0 0 0 Celsius 120000 -30
1980 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Ontario Ottawa 3500 Low Celsius 120000 -30
1981 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Vermont Orleans 2200 Low N/A 0 0
1982 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Vermont Orleans 2200 Medium N/A 0 0
1983 United States Size by Square Footage and Location Vermont Orleans 2400 Medium N/A 0 0
1984 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Nova Scotia Kentville 3000 High N/A 0 0
1985 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Saskatchewan Saskatoon 1900 High N/A 0 0
1986 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location British Columbia Victoria 4500 Low N/A 0 0
1987 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location Newfoundland and Labrador St. John?s 4000 High N/A 0 0
1988 United States Size by Square Footage and Location New York Tompkins 2250 Medium N/A 0 0
1989 Canada Size by Square Footage and Location British Columbia Nanaimo 4500 Medium N/A 0 0

*NOTE* This heat pump sizing tool does not consider cooling loads. There is a possibility that your cooling load is higher than your heating load, and as such the heat pump model suggested by this tool might not be appropriate for your project. This issue is most likely to effect customers based around the great lakes and in the southeast quarter of the U.S.A where summer humidity is high. If your project is located in these areas, a calculated cooling load needs to be considered. A manual J report can calculate the cooling load of your project accurately.

Arctic takes no responsibility for any cooling performance issues resulting from using this estimation to size a heat pump instead of a manual J.

If you would like Arctic to conduct a manual J for your project, please click the link below:

heat load design service
Arctic Heat pumps Logo

LET US HELP

OUR PRODUCTS

RESOURCES

RESOURCES